Learn from others’ mistakes
Five of the most costly and preventable mistakes in piping design — drawn from real projects, real rework, and real conversations with senior designers. Five more, with full field context and deeper technical analysis, are reserved for The Piping Designer’s Companion.
A designer works for two weeks on a P&ID that was superseded three days ago. Nobody told them. The document control system had a notification process that nobody had set up. Complete rework, schedule impact, damaged reputation.
A designer routes a new 6-inch line based on as-built drawings showing a clear corridor. On site: an 8-inch nitrogen line running exactly through the planned routing. Never documented. Added fifteen years ago. Discovered during construction, during the shutdown window.
An Emergency Isolation Valve is correctly specified on the P&ID and modelled at the correct elevation. It is located behind a bank of large-bore pipes. Access requires climbing over a 350°C line. The valve is relocated during a subsequent shutdown at enormous cost.
A designer models an entire system with globe valves where the P&ID specified gate valves. The symbols were slightly different from their previous project. Nobody checked. Three weeks of rework, plus replacement of already-ordered globe valves.
A process engineer verbally asks a junior designer to change a carbon steel line to stainless steel. The designer changes the model. No MOC. Three months later the stress engineer discovers it: different expansion coefficient, inadequate supports, two weeks of schedule delay.
The pattern behind every mistake
Every one of these mistakes shares the same root cause: something was assumed instead of verified. The P&ID revision, the as-built dimensions, the welding clearance, the operator access. Experienced designers are not smarter — they verify more, and they have learned which assumptions are dangerous.